linux-kernel - Re: System clock runs too fast after 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28.1 upgrade

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090122195132.GZ21473@genesis.frugalware.org>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:51:32 +0100
From:	Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@...galware.org>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	CSÉCSY László <boobaa@...galware.org>
Subject: Re: System clock runs too fast after 2.6.27 -> 2.6.28.1 upgrade

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:34:06PM -0800, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
> Miklos: Can you try bisecting this down some?

I did it two times when I finally realised that it depends on the
config. So currently I have two config files, with "-good" the clock is
fine, with "-bad" it's too fast.

Of course the diff contains unrelated changes as well, I'm trying to
find which one is the problematic one.

View attachment "config-bad" of type "text/plain" (96051 bytes)

View attachment "config-good" of type "text/plain" (94115 bytes)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped