[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090122232840.GA5854@ioremap.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:28:40 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: kyle@...radead.org
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
J?rn Engel <joern@...fs.org>, David Brown <lkml@...idb.org>,
Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
Hi Kyle.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 05:50:26PM -0500, Kyle McMartin (kyle@...hat.com) wrote:
> (I also think TAINT_CRAP is kind of an insulting name for things which
> are really Linux-targetted features that just haven't had thorough
> enough review. Evgeniy Polyakov's work comes to mind... it's really
> comparing apples to a bunch of festering pieces of turd. While I'm sure
> he's happy to have gotten his stuff in for more review, is it likely to
> actually get more review than it would with weekly mailing list
> postings? Maybe, who am I to say... I do think labelling his work crap
> by virtue of the directory it resides in is fairly silly.)
Reviews really do not happen based on the fact that code is in the tree
or not. Most of the time it is submission time and maintainer's look at
bugs. People like to talk about reviews, but when it does not happen at
submission time, let's just move further :)
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists