[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090123051620.GA8122@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:16:20 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 016/104] epoll: introduce resource usage limits
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 03:51:01PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:48 -0800, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too.
>
> Our fairly heavily loaded postfix backup mx (lots of spams rejected per day) hit this
> limit running kernel 2.6.27.8. Any particular reason for it being as low as 128
> by default?
Something had to be picked :)
> This is a kvm virtual machine running on a reasonably beefy external box, but
> with 2Gb RAM allocated to the mx instance because that's all kvm would let me
> use last time I checked. We're using KVM so the local copy of the database is
> a little further away from the "internet facing side" and so we can build each
> machine with our standard FAI setup.
I would suggest just changing this default value then, it's a simple
userspace configuration item, and for your boxes, it sounds like a
larger value would be more suitable.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists