linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] atyfb: fix distorted image on PowerMacs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18809.53887.67378.673723@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:21:51 +0100
From:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To:	Risto Suominen <risto.suominen@...il.com>
Cc:	Alex Kern <alex.kern@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atyfb: fix distorted image on PowerMacs

Risto Suominen writes:
 > Since the complete re-write in 2.6.10, some PowerMacs (At least PowerMac 5500
 > and PowerMac G3 Beige rev A) with ATI Mach64 chip have suffered from unstable
 > columns in their framebuffer image. This seems to depend on a value (4) read
 > from PLL_EXT_CNTL register, which leads to incorrect DSP config parameters to
 > be written to the chip. This patch uses a value calculated by aty_init_pll_ct
 > instead, as a starting point.
 > 
 > Signed-off-by: Risto Suominen <Risto.Suominen@...il.com>

Thank you. I reported this issue way back in March 2005
<http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=111175371705665&w=2>
but nothing ever came out of that. Your patch applies
cleanly to 2.6.29-rc2 and fixes the issue on my Beige G3.

Tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>


 > ---
 > The testing is done on kernel version 2.6.18.
 > 
 > --- a/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c.org	2006-09-20 06:42:06.000000000 +0300
 > +++ b/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c	2009-01-22 14:28:13.000000000 +0200
 > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 >  #include <linux/delay.h>
 >  #include <asm/io.h>
 >  #include <video/mach64.h>
 > +#include <asm/machdep.h>
 >  #include "atyfb.h"
 > 
 >  #undef DEBUG
 > @@ -536,6 +537,14 @@ static int __init aty_init_pll_ct(const
 >  	pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real = postdividers[xpost_div];
 >  	pll->ct.mclk_fb_div = q * pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real / 8;
 > 
 > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
 > +	if (machine_is(powermac)) {
 > +		/* Override PLL_EXT_CNTL & 0x07. */
 > +		pll->ct.xclk_post_div = xpost_div;
 > +		pll->ct.xclk_ref_div = 1;
 > +	}
 > +#endif
 > +
 >  #ifdef DEBUG
 >  	pllmclk = (1000000 * pll->ct.mclk_fb_mult * pll->ct.mclk_fb_div) /
 >  			(par->ref_clk_per * pll->ct.pll_ref_div);
 > Since the complete re-write in 2.6.10, some PowerMacs (At least PowerMac 5500
 > and PowerMac G3 Beige rev A) with ATI Mach64 chip have suffered from unstable
 > columns in their framebuffer image. This seems to depend on a value (4) read
 > from PLL_EXT_CNTL register, which leads to incorrect DSP config parameters to
 > be written to the chip. This patch uses a value calculated by aty_init_pll_ct
 > instead, as a starting point.
 > 
 > Signed-off-by: Risto Suominen <Risto.Suominen@...il.com>
 > ---
 > The testing is done on kernel version 2.6.18.
 > 
 > --- a/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c.org	2006-09-20 06:42:06.000000000 +0300
 > +++ b/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c	2009-01-22 14:28:13.000000000 +0200
 > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 >  #include <linux/delay.h>
 >  #include <asm/io.h>
 >  #include <video/mach64.h>
 > +#include <asm/machdep.h>
 >  #include "atyfb.h"
 >  
 >  #undef DEBUG
 > @@ -536,6 +537,14 @@ static int __init aty_init_pll_ct(const 
 >  	pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real = postdividers[xpost_div];
 >  	pll->ct.mclk_fb_div = q * pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real / 8;
 >  
 > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
 > +	if (machine_is(powermac)) {
 > +		/* Override PLL_EXT_CNTL & 0x07. */
 > +		pll->ct.xclk_post_div = xpost_div;
 > +		pll->ct.xclk_ref_div = 1;
 > +	}
 > +#endif
 > +
 >  #ifdef DEBUG
 >  	pllmclk = (1000000 * pll->ct.mclk_fb_mult * pll->ct.mclk_fb_div) /
 >  			(par->ref_clk_per * pll->ct.pll_ref_div);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/