[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da824cf30901231051m5d11678k5eb2086ac18457ff@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:51:18 -0800
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com, chinang.ma@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sharad.c.tripathi@...el.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
harita.chilukuri@...el.com, douglas.w.styner@...el.com,
peter.xihong.wang@...el.com, hubert.nueckel@...el.com,
chris.mason@...cle.com, srostedt@...hat.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, andrew.vasquez@...gic.com,
anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com
Subject: Re: care and feeding of netperf (Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance
update)
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> wrote:
...
> And I would probably add the -c and -C options to have netperf report
> service demands.
For performance analysis, the service demand is often more interesting
than the absolute performance (which typically only varies a few Mb/s
for gigE NICs). I strongly encourage adding -c and -C.
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists