[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497A3117.2070809@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:05:27 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86: add pte_set_flags/clear_flags for
pteflag manipulation
Jan Beulich wrote:
> I think a comment (or event a BUG_ON()) should be added here to make
> clear that this absolutely must not be used to toggle the present bit. I
> even view toggling _PAGE_PSE as dangerous this way.
>
> And alternative would be to make these macros and #undef them (or keep
> them inline functions but add destructive #define-s) after all their users.
>
I don't see any particular problem with changing PSE or even Present
with these functions; they don't operate on live in-memory ptes, so its
not like they could ever be used to modify a pte unless followed with
some kind of set_pte operation. It is unwise to change any pte flag
without knowing what you're doing (though P or PSE would probably have
less subtle effects than some of the others).
But it probably wouldn't hurt to have a __ prefix to indicate they're
"internal" and not for general use.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists