[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090123022014.GB9267@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:20:14 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Fix root_count when mount fails due to busy
subsystem
Quoting Paul Menage (menage@...gle.com):
> cgroup: Fix root_count when mount fails due to busy subsystem
>
> root_count was being incremented in cgroup_get_sb() after all error
> checking was complete, but decremented in cgroup_kill_sb(), which can
> be called on a superblock that we gave up on due to an error. This
> patch changes cgroup_kill_sb() to only decrement root_count if the
> root was previously linked into the list of roots.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
thanks,
-serge
>
> ---
>
> I was actually surprised to find that list_del() doesn't crash when
> run on an unattached list_head structure.
>
> kernel/cgroup.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index adcd0bb..9ce27e8 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -1115,8 +1115,10 @@ static void cgroup_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb) {
> }
> write_unlock(&css_set_lock);
>
> - list_del(&root->root_list);
> - root_count--;
> + if (!list_empty(&root->root_list)) {
> + list_del(&root->root_list);
> + root_count--;
> + }
>
> mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists