linux-kernel - Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1232683247.15489.103.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:00:47 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator

On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 04:35 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> That's a fair point. Hugh dislikes it too, I see ;) What to do... I
> had been toying with the idea that if slqb (or slub) becomes "the"
> allocator, then we could rename it all back to slAb after replacing
> the existing slab?

maybe SLIB (slab-improved) or SLAB_NG or NSLAB or SLABX
Who says it has to be 4 letters?

> Or I could make it a 128 bit allocator and call it SLZB, which would
> definitely make it "the final" allocator ;)

That leads to the phone book game.

SLZZB - and a crystal bridge now spans the fissure.

Hmm, wrong game.

cheers, j

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/