| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:15:02 +0300
From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Clarification of allowed context for crypto routines
On 24 января 2009 01:31:50 Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> 2) The highmem primitives we use are currently softirq only. We
> could make them work for hardirq as well, but because of 1) we
> didn't.
>
Could you point to example of such primitive in code under crypto?
Thank you!
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists