lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:59:06 +0100
From:	Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, DSA <debian-admin@...ts.debian.org>,
	team@...urity.debian.org, libpam-modules@...kages.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28, rlimits, performance and debian etch

* David Daney:

> One problem is that for values of RLIMIT_NOFILE less than something
> like 4096, it is much faster to call sys_close() on all possible
> values than iterate through a handful of open files from /proc/self/fd
> using opendir(3)/readdir(3).

Really?  Yuck.

> The real solution is to convert your user space programs to use the
> new syscalls that allow for race-free setting of close-on-exec.
> Then you no longer need to mess around with iterating over these
> things.

These system calls are too recent to use in the next two Debian
releases.  In addition, we can't really be sure that all libraries use
the new calls.

I find the design of the CLOEXEC business somewhat revulsive, by the
way.  It reminds me of those DoSomethingEx APIs in another platform.
The *_at system calls are a similar wart.  Even with this stuff, I
still can't safely open a file with a different effective user ID in a
multithreaded application, or create a AF_UNIX socket with specific
file system permissions.  Some thread-specific context with what have
been traditionally considered per-process attributes might have been
better. 8-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ