[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090126130703.GA16792@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:07:03 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: optimize a bit __raw_read_trylock
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> The current version of __raw_read_trylock starts with decrementing the lock
> and read its new value as a separate operation after that.
>
> That makes 3 dereferences (read, write (after sub), read) whereas
> a single atomic_dec_return does only two pointers dereferences (read, write).
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 2bd6b11..139b424 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -267,8 +267,7 @@ static inline int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *lock)
> {
> atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
>
> - atomic_dec(count);
> - if (atomic_read(count) >= 0)
> + if (atomic_dec_return(count) >= 0)
> return 1;
> atomic_inc(count);
> return 0;
nice one ... applied it to tip/x86/asm, thanks Frederic!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists