[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57C9024A16AD2D4C97DC78E552063EA35F1F9374@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:39:06 -0800
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Papi <ptools-perfapi@...utk.edu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
"eranian@...il.com" <eranian@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [perfmon2] [announce] Performance Counters for Linux, v6
> - or the PMU capability is expressed as a special counter type (if it's
> useful enough) - and then either the write() method or ioctl is extended
> to express attributes we want to set/change while a counter is running.
The product of:
{exotic PMU modes} * {creative performance measurement ideas}
will produce a large number of candidates for these special counters
(at least on ia64 ... which has a large number of exotic PMU options).
I don't think that I'm qualified to judge which of them are "useful enough"
to warrant a special counter type.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists