lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:27:27 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, travis@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
	davej@...hat.com, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue.


* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > So if it's generic it ought to be implemented in a generic way - not a 
> > "dont use from any codepath that has a lock held that might 
> > occasionally also be held in a keventd worklet". (which is a totally 
> > unmaintainable proposition and which would just cause repeat bugs 
> > again and again.)
> 
> That's different.  The core fault here lies in the keventd workqueue 
> handling code.  If we're flushing work A then we shouldn't go and block 
> behind unrelated work B.

the blocking is inherent in the concept of "a queue of worklets handled by 
a single thread".

If a worklet is blocked then all other work performed by that thread is 
blocked as well. So by waiting on a piece of work in the queue, we wait 
for all prior work queued up there as well.

The only way to decouple that and to make them independent (and hence 
independently flushable) is to create more parallel flows of execution: 
i.e. by creating another thread (another workqueue).

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ