[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233010818.14510.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:00:18 -0800
From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com>
To: rml@...h9.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kpreempt-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] Fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code in
print_fatal_signal()
With print-fatal-signals=1 on a kernel with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, sending an
unexpected signal to a process causes a BUG: using smp_processor_id() in
preemptible code.
get_signal_to_deliver() releases the siglock before calling
print_fatal_signal(), which calls show_regs(), which calls
smp_processor_id(), which is not supposed to be called from a
preemptible thread.
Calling print_fatal_signal() before releasing the siglock avoids this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com>
---
Index: linux-2.6.27.4/kernel/signal.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27.4.orig/kernel/signal.c
+++ linux-2.6.27.4/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1848,6 +1848,11 @@ relock:
continue;
}
+ if (sig_kernel_coredump(signr) && print_fatal_signals) {
+ /* hold lock for smp_processor_id() */
+ print_fatal_signal(regs, info->si_signo);
+ }
+
spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
/*
@@ -1856,8 +1861,6 @@ relock:
current->flags |= PF_SIGNALED;
if (sig_kernel_coredump(signr)) {
- if (print_fatal_signals)
- print_fatal_signal(regs, info->si_signo);
/*
* If it was able to dump core, this kills all
* other threads in the group and synchronizes with
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists