linux-kernel - Re: unified percpu stuff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73c1f2160901270435t5623b0d8tbf832b1f8a575b2e@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:35:02 -0500
From:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: unified percpu stuff

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Brian Gerst wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm really pleased to see the unified percpu stuff in the kernel, but
>>> unfortunately its breaking Xen at the moment.
>>> It looks like this is just a matter of initializing %gs properly in
>>> xen_start_kernel.  Is there any problem with me doing a load_gs_base(0)
>>> somewhere early in xen_start_kernel (arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c)?
>>>
>>
>> Some of the changes I did made the assumption that the percpu state is
>> set up early in head_xx.S, which apparently is skipped for xen.  Is
>> there documentation anywhere for the xen bootstrap process?
>>
>
> Not really.  Its quite different from native because the guest kernel starts
> up in protected/long mode with paging enabled, using a Xen-provided
> pagetable.  It means that most of the normal head.S stuff is redundant; the
> kernel starts executing more or less exactly at xen_start_kernel (there's a
> 2 instruction asm part which stashes away the Xen info pointer from %[re]si,
> then jumps to xen_start_kernel).
>
>> Try this patch (untested):
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> index bef941f..b90d061 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -1647,6 +1647,8 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
>>        have_vcpu_info_placement = 0;
>>  #endif
>>
>> +       switch_to_new_gdt();
>> +
>>        xen_smp_init();
>>
>>        /* Get mfn list */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> index 7735e3d..00d9265 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> @@ -235,6 +235,8 @@ cpu_initialize_context(unsigned int cpu, struct
>> task_struct *idle)
>>        ctxt->user_regs.ss = __KERNEL_DS;
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>>        ctxt->user_regs.fs = __KERNEL_PERCPU;
>> +#else
>> +       ctxt->gs_base_kernel = per_cpu_offset(cpu);
>>  #endif
>>        ctxt->user_regs.eip = (unsigned long)cpu_bringup_and_idle;
>>        ctxt->user_regs.eflags = 0x1000; /* IOPL_RING1 */
>>
>
> Thanks, I'll try this out.
>
> BTW, does the initial cpu0 percpu area get reallocated and moved during
> boot, or does cpu0 keep using the same memory forever?

It is reallocated in setup_per_cpu_areas().

--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/