[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090127131534.GG23121@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:15:34 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: kzalloc mod->ref
* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> @@ -344,8 +339,11 @@ struct module
> /* Destruction function. */
> void (*exit)(void);
>
> - /* Reference counts */
> - struct module_ref ref[NR_CPUS];
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + char *refptr;
> +#else
> + local_t ref;
> +#endif
hm, that construct looks rather ugly. Is there no way to provide a clean
data type and APIs for this that just work symmetrically on both SMP and
UP?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists