[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090127163330.GD8289@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:33:30 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: apw@...onical.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Checkpatch false positive?
On Tue 27-01-09 08:19:54, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:49:05 +0100
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've used checkpatch.pl to verify one of my patches. It complains:
> >
> > ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
> > #167: FILE: fs/quota/quota_tree.c:249:
> > + for (i = 0, ddquot = buf + sizeof(struct qt_disk_dqdbheader);
> > [...]
> > i++, ddquot += info->dqi_entry_size);
> >
> > But the code looks like:
> > for (i = 0, ddquot = buf + sizeof(struct qt_disk_dqdbheader);
> > i < qtree_dqstr_in_blk(info)
> > && !qtree_entry_unused(info, ddquot); i++, ddquot +=
> > info->dqi_entry_size);
> >
>
> while tihs might be correct C... don't you think it would be much
> better to actually have a statement here rather than cramming
> everything into the for ?
This is an old code and I was just wrapping lines to fit into 80 chars...
But you're right, I can rewrite the loop into more readable form when I'm
at it.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists