lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090128093821.GA14549@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:08:22 +0530
From:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	powertop ml <power@...host.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, srostedt@...hat.com,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracer for sys_open() - sreadahead

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:43:05PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:08:04PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
> > 
> > This tracer monitors regular file open() syscalls. This is a fast
> > and low-overhead alternative to strace, and does not allow or
> > require to be attached to every process.
> > 
> > The tracer only logs succesfull calls, as those are the only ones we
> > are currently interested in, and we can determine the absolute path
> > of these files as we log.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
> 
> 
> Hi Auke,
> 
> Speaking about a global syscall tracer, I made a patch to trace only the syscalls
> with the function-graph-tracer.
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/30/267
> 
> Its approach and purpose is different than a tracer dedicated only to syscalls.
> The function graph tracer traces execution graph of the functions and is more about
> execution time spent and code flow whereas a syscall tracer can provide more specific
> informations about syscalls.
> 
> So both are not overlaping.
> 
> But the low level part of my patch creates a thread flag _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE which triggers
> a ptrace hook when set.
> This low-level part can easily be used by all tracers that would like to inspect syscalls.
> 
> Just a change is needed: Steven requested that the part inside syscall_trace_enter become
> a tracepoint, making it totally shareable between tracers and easy to turn on and off.
> 
> And perhaps the parts that set/clear the flag on all tasks can be shared too.
> 
> So we can start with this low-level syscall tracing facility. If you want, I can adapt
> this low-level part and submit a patch this week or the next one to give you this base
> infrastructure.
> 
> 
> Once we have it, I think a syscall tracer can be fed with new syscalls events through
> several patch iterations, starting with the open and close one :-)

Here is something I did sometime ago that uses utrace. It is per task
doesn't use ftrace and is just intended as a prototype. It traces both
syscalls and returns.

---

Here is the beginnings of a simple utrace based strace. Right now, one
needs to invoke this program with a 'insmod <modname> tid=<tid>'.

The output looks something like this:
[267352.641112] Attached to 32604 => 0xd8f60090
[267353.981046] 2
[267353.981085] 197 0x1 0xbff8cd84 0x86cff4 0x86d4c0 0x86d4c0 0xbff8cd50a = 0
[267353.981097] 192 0x0 0x1000 0x3 0x22 0xffffffff 0x0 = b7f8d000
[267353.981124] 4 0x1 0xb7f8d000 0xd 0xd 0xb7f8d000 0xbff8cda8 = d
[267353.981174] 4 0x1 0xb7f8d000 0x3 0x3 0xb7f8d000 0xbff8c7dc = 3
[267353.981209] 252 0x0 0x0 0x86e0d0 0x0 0x86b274 0xbff8cee8 = 
[267353.981215] Task 32604 exited
[267355.460180] Cannot find PID 32604

I know strace does a pretty print, but this is a quick and dirty
prototype.
---

#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/utrace.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <asm/syscall.h>

MODULE_DESCRIPTION("syscall trace");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

static int target_tid;

module_param_named(tid, target_tid, int, 0);

static u32 task_syscall_entry(u32 action, struct utrace_attached_engine *engine,
		struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	long callno;
	unsigned long args[6];

	callno = syscall_get_nr(task, regs);
	syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 0, 6, args);

	printk(KERN_INFO "%ld 0x%lx 0x%lx 0x%lx 0x%lx 0x%lx 0x%lx = ",
		callno, args[0], args[1], args[2], args[3], args[4], args[5]);
	return UTRACE_RESUME;
}

static u32 task_syscall_exit(u32 action, struct utrace_attached_engine *engine,
		struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	long retval = syscall_get_return_value(task, regs);
	printk("%lx\n", retval);
	return UTRACE_RESUME;
}

static u32 task_exit(enum utrace_resume_action action,
		struct utrace_attached_engine *engine, struct task_struct *task,
		long orig_code, long *code)
{
	printk("\n");
	printk(KERN_INFO "Task %d exited\n", target_tid);
	return UTRACE_DETACH;
}

static const struct utrace_engine_ops syscall_ops =
{
	.report_syscall_entry = task_syscall_entry,
	.report_syscall_exit = task_syscall_exit,
	.report_exit = task_exit,
};

static int __init strace_init(void)
{
	struct pid *pid;
	int ret = 0;
	struct task_struct *target;
	struct utrace_attached_engine *engine;

	pid = find_get_pid(target_tid);
	if (pid == NULL) {
		printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot find PID %d\n", target_tid);
		ret = -ESRCH;
		goto out;
	}

	engine = utrace_attach_pid(pid, UTRACE_ATTACH_CREATE, &syscall_ops, 0);
	if (IS_ERR(engine)) {
		printk(KERN_ERR "utrace_attach_pid: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(engine));
		ret = -EINVAL;
		goto out;
	} else if (engine == NULL) {
		printk(KERN_ERR "utrace_attach_pid => NULL\n");
		ret = -EINVAL;
		goto out;
	} else
		printk(KERN_INFO "Attached to %d => 0x%p\n",
				target_tid, engine);

	/*
	 * If utrace_attach_pid() succeeded above, we are sure the target
	 * is valid here
	 */
	target = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
	put_pid(pid);

	ret = utrace_set_events(target, engine, UTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL |
			UTRACE_EVENT(EXIT));
	if (ret)
		printk(KERN_ERR "utrace_set_events returned %d\n", ret);

out:
	return ret;
}

static void __exit strace_exit(void)
{
	int ret = 0;
	struct pid *pid;
	struct utrace_attached_engine *engine;
	struct task_struct *target;

	pid = find_get_pid(target_tid);
	if (pid == NULL) {
		printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot find PID %d\n", target_tid);
		return;
	}

	target = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
	put_pid(pid);
	engine = utrace_attach_task(target, UTRACE_ATTACH_MATCH_OPS,
			&syscall_ops, 0);
	if (IS_ERR(engine))
		printk(KERN_ERR "Can't find self: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(engine));
	else if (engine == NULL)
		printk(KERN_ERR "Can't find self: no match\n");
	else {
		printk(KERN_INFO "Trying detach 0x%p from %d\n",
				engine, target_tid);
		ret = utrace_control(target, engine, UTRACE_DETACH);
		if (ret)
			printk(KERN_ERR "utrace_control returned %d\n",
					ret);
	}
}

module_init(strace_init);
module_exit(strace_exit);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ