[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233140081.3936.21.camel@johannes.local>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:54:41 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] timer: implement lockdep deadlock detection
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:13 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 10:54 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 09:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 19:57 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > This modifies the timer code in a way to allow lockdep to detect
> > > > deadlocks resulting from a lock being taken in the timer function
> > > > as well as around the del_timer_sync() call.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> > >
> > > Nice, thanks!
> >
> > I actually got "trying to register non-static key" on my powerpc64
> > machine. Is there a possibility that functions are not static??
>
> Hmm, weird, afaict static_obj() includes both text and data, for the
> core kernel as well as modules.
Yeah, I'd think it should. I'll run it by the powerpc list when I get it
again, it only seems to happen very rarely.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists