[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49804882.2060000@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:58:58 +0900
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
To: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, "Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>
CC: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
shaohua.li@...el.com, Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_get_interrupt_pin
Current pci_get_interrupt_pin() seems to have an assumption that
pci_bus->self is NULL on the root pci bus. But it might not be true on
some platforms. Because of this wrong assumption, current
pci_get_interrupt_pin() might cause endless loop. We must check
pci_bus->parent instead.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.29-rc2/drivers/pci/pci.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.29-rc2.orig/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ linux-2.6.29-rc2/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1433,7 +1433,7 @@ pci_get_interrupt_pin(struct pci_dev *de
if (!pin)
return -1;
- while (dev->bus->self) {
+ while (dev->bus->parent) {
pin = pci_swizzle_interrupt_pin(dev, pin);
dev = dev->bus->self;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists