[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090128144955.GA23089@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:49:55 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] omap mailbox: fix empty struct device for omap1
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:27:27AM +0200, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <mach/mailbox.h>
> #include <mach/irqs.h>
>
> +#define DRV_NAME "omap1-mailbox"
I don't see any need for this define - it just adds an additional level of
indirection when trying to find out the name of the driver. It's only
used in two places as is, so it's value is rather limited:
> @@ -184,9 +184,9 @@ static int omap1_mbox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static struct platform_driver omap1_mbox_driver = {
> .probe = omap1_mbox_probe,
> - .remove = omap1_mbox_remove,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(omap1_mbox_remove),
> .driver = {
> - .name = "mailbox",
> + .name = DRV_NAME,
> },
> };
>
> @@ -203,4 +203,7 @@ static void __exit omap1_mbox_exit(void)
> module_init(omap1_mbox_init);
> module_exit(omap1_mbox_exit);
>
> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("omap mailbox: omap1 architecture specific functions");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Hiroshi DOYU" <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>);
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:"DRV_NAME);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists