[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4980CD51.70601@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:25:37 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [mingo@...e.hu: [git pull] headers_check fixes]
Harvey Harrison wrote:
>
> For now, the problem is with arches like X86 that need to test the availability of
> an instruction. So the arch versions could be unconditionally offered on X86_64
> and the lowest-common denominator (no BSWAP) on X86-32. If we still want the
> optimized (BSWAP) versions on X86-32 the tests will have to use the compiler arch flags
> as opposed to CONFIG_BSWAP....which is probably not worth the trouble.
>
Well, that's how the headers were originally written, I believe.
CONFIG_BSWAP can be replaced with the __i486__ macro, and since most
distros compile for i586 or i686 these days, it might actually make
sense for this one particular case.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists