linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH 6/10] Convert m68k to use arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1233202175.6895.40.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:09:35 -0800
From:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, cooloney@...nel.org, starvik@...s.com,
	takata@...ux-m32r.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, wli@...omorphy.com,
	chris@...kel.net, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 6/10] Convert m68k to use arch_getoffset()
	infrastructure.

This patch converts m68k to use GENERIC_TIME via the arch_getoffset()
infrastructure 

I do not have cross compilers for these architectures, and in some cases
the architectures can be compiles both with and without clocksources. So
I've taken my best swing at converting this, but I'm not confident I got
it right. Any assistance from arch maintainers or testers would be
great.

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>


diff --git a/arch/m68k/Kconfig b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
index fb87c08..29dd848 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
@@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ config HZ
 	int
 	default 100
 
+config GENERIC_TIME
+	def_bool y
+
+config ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
+	def_bool y
+
 mainmenu "Linux/68k Kernel Configuration"
 
 source "init/Kconfig"
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
index 7db4159..0b1ecf3 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
@@ -90,72 +90,7 @@ void __init time_init(void)
 	mach_sched_init(timer_interrupt);
 }
 
-/*
- * This version of gettimeofday has near microsecond resolution.
- */
-void do_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	unsigned long seq;
-	unsigned long usec, sec;
-	unsigned long max_ntp_tick = tick_usec - tickadj;
-
-	do {
-		seq = read_seqbegin_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags);
-
-		usec = mach_gettimeoffset();
-
-		/*
-		 * If time_adjust is negative then NTP is slowing the clock
-		 * so make sure not to go into next possible interval.
-		 * Better to lose some accuracy than have time go backwards..
-		 */
-		if (unlikely(time_adjust < 0))
-			usec = min(usec, max_ntp_tick);
-
-		sec = xtime.tv_sec;
-		usec += xtime.tv_nsec/1000;
-	} while (read_seqretry_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, seq, flags));
-
-
-	while (usec >= 1000000) {
-		usec -= 1000000;
-		sec++;
-	}
-
-	tv->tv_sec = sec;
-	tv->tv_usec = usec;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_gettimeofday);
-
-int do_settimeofday(struct timespec *tv)
+u32 arch_gettimeoffset(void)
 {
-	time_t wtm_sec, sec = tv->tv_sec;
-	long wtm_nsec, nsec = tv->tv_nsec;
-
-	if ((unsigned long)tv->tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	write_seqlock_irq(&xtime_lock);
-	/* This is revolting. We need to set the xtime.tv_nsec
-	 * correctly. However, the value in this location is
-	 * is value at the last tick.
-	 * Discover what correction gettimeofday
-	 * would have done, and then undo it!
-	 */
-	nsec -= 1000 * mach_gettimeoffset();
-
-	wtm_sec  = wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec + (xtime.tv_sec - sec);
-	wtm_nsec = wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec + (xtime.tv_nsec - nsec);
-
-	set_normalized_timespec(&xtime, sec, nsec);
-	set_normalized_timespec(&wall_to_monotonic, wtm_sec, wtm_nsec);
-
-	ntp_clear();
-	write_sequnlock_irq(&xtime_lock);
-	clock_was_set();
-	return 0;
+	return mach_gettimeoffset() * 1000;
 }
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/