[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129044227.GA5231@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:42:27 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Chuck Lever <cel@...i.umich.edu>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC v7] wait: prevent exclusive waiter starvation
On 01/28, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> Add abort_exclusive_wait() which removes the process' wait descriptor
> from the waitqueue, iff still queued, or wakes up the next waiter
> otherwise. It does so under the waitqueue lock. Racing with a wake
> up means the aborting process is either already woken (removed from
> the queue) and will wake up the next waiter, or it will remove itself
> from the queue and the concurrent wake up will apply to the next
> waiter after it.
>
> Use abort_exclusive_wait() in __wait_event_interruptible_exclusive()
> and __wait_on_bit_lock() when they were interrupted by other means
> than a wake up through the queue.
Imho, this all is right, and this patch should replace
lock_page_killable-avoid-lost-wakeups.patch (except for stable tree).
But I guess we need maintainer's opinion, we have them in cc ;)
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists