[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090129141338.34e44a1f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:13:38 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: open(2) says O_DIRECT works on 512 byte boundries?
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:33:22 -0800
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> In looking at open(2), it says that O_DIRECT works on 512 byte boundries
> with the 2.6 kernel release:
> Under Linux 2.4, transfer sizes, and the alignment of the user
> buffer and the file offset must all be multiples of the logical
> block size of the file system. Under Linux 2.6, alignment to
> 512-byte boundaries suffices.
>
> However if you try to access an O_DIRECT opened file with a buffer that
> is PAGE_SIZE aligned + 512 bytes, it fails in a bad way (wrong data is
> read.)
>
IIUC, it's not related to 512bytes boundary. Just a race between
direct-io v.s. copy-on-write. Copy-on-Write while reading a page via DIO
is a problem.
Maybe it's true that if buffer is aligned to page size, no copy-on-write will
happen in usual program. But assuming HugeTLB page, which does Copy-on-Write,
data corruption will happen again. HugeTLB aligned buffer is nonsense.
Thanks,
-Kame
> Is this just a mistake in the documentation? Or am I reading it
> incorrectly?
>
> I have a test program that shows this if anyone wants it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists