[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129080603.GA26882@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:06:03 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] forget_original_parent: cleanup ptrace pathes
No functional changes.
- Fold ptrace_exit() into forget_original_parent(), it is trivial
now. More importantly, this makes the code more symmetrical with
reparent_thread().
- The same for ptrace_exit_finish(), and "ptrace_" is not correct
any longer.
- "ptrace_dead" doesn't match the reality, rename to "dead_list".
- swap the reparent_thread()'s arguments, just to make it more
symmetrical with __ptrace_detach().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
--- 6.29-rc3/kernel/exit.c~8_CLEANUP 2009-01-29 08:03:18.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/kernel/exit.c 2009-01-29 08:54:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -770,42 +770,8 @@ int __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *
return 1;
}
-/*
- * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on.
- * Any that need to be release_task'd are put on the @dead list.
- *
- * Called with write_lock(&tasklist_lock) held.
- */
-static void ptrace_exit(struct task_struct *parent, struct list_head *dead)
-{
- struct task_struct *p, *n;
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &parent->ptraced, ptrace_entry) {
- if (__ptrace_detach(parent, p))
- list_add(&p->ptrace_entry, dead);
- }
-}
-
-/*
- * Finish up exit-time ptrace cleanup.
- *
- * Called without locks.
- */
-static void ptrace_exit_finish(struct task_struct *parent,
- struct list_head *dead)
-{
- struct task_struct *p, *n;
-
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&parent->ptraced));
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, dead, ptrace_entry) {
- list_del_init(&p->ptrace_entry);
- release_task(p);
- }
-}
-
/* Returns nonzero if the child should be released. */
-static int reparent_thread(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *father)
+static int reparent_thread(struct task_struct *father, struct task_struct *p)
{
int dead;
@@ -886,14 +852,17 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reap
static void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct *father)
{
struct task_struct *p, *n, *reaper;
- LIST_HEAD(ptrace_dead);
+ LIST_HEAD(dead_list);
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
reaper = find_new_reaper(father);
/*
* First clean up ptrace if we were using it.
*/
- ptrace_exit(father, &ptrace_dead);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &father->ptraced, ptrace_entry) {
+ if (__ptrace_detach(father, p))
+ list_add(&p->ptrace_entry, &dead_list);
+ }
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &father->children, sibling) {
p->real_parent = reaper;
@@ -901,14 +870,18 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struc
BUG_ON(p->ptrace);
p->parent = p->real_parent;
}
- if (reparent_thread(p, father))
- list_add(&p->ptrace_entry, &ptrace_dead);;
+ if (reparent_thread(father, p))
+ list_add(&p->ptrace_entry, &dead_list);;
}
-
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&father->children));
+ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&father->ptraced));
- ptrace_exit_finish(father, &ptrace_dead);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &dead_list, ptrace_entry) {
+ list_del_init(&p->ptrace_entry);
+ release_task(p);
+ }
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists