[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090129003321.e9c8c36c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:33:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] input: bcm5974: Prepare for a new trackpad header
type
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:23:44 +0100 "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se> wrote:
> static int report_tp_state(struct bcm5974 *dev, int size)
> {
> const struct bcm5974_config *c = &dev->cfg;
> - const struct tp_finger *f = dev->tp_data->finger;
> + const struct tp_finger *f;
> struct input_dev *input = dev->input;
> - const int fingers = (size - 26) / 28;
> - int raw_p, raw_w, raw_x, raw_y;
> + int raw_p, raw_w, raw_x, raw_y, raw_n;
> int ptest = 0, origin = 0, nmin = 0, nmax = 0;
> int abs_p = 0, abs_w = 0, abs_x = 0, abs_y = 0;
>
> - if (size < 26 || (size - 26) % 28 != 0)
> + if (size < c->tp_offset || (size - c->tp_offset) % SIZEOF_FINGER != 0)
> return -EIO;
>
> + f = (const struct tp_finger *)(dev->tp_data + c->tp_offset);
Is there anything which guarantees that `f' is sufficiently aligned?
If not, the code might cause unaligned exceptions on some
architectures?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists