[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233220048.7835.19.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:07:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Thomas Pilarski <thomas.pi@...or.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12562] New: High overhead while switching or
synchronizing threads on different cores
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:25 +0100, Thomas Pilarski wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 12:56 -0800 schrieb Andrew Morton:
>
> > (There's testcase code in the bugzilla report)
> >
> > (Seems to be a regression)
>
> There is a regression, because of the improved cpu switching. The
> problem exists in every kernel.
This is a contradiction in terms - twice.
If it is a regression, then clearly things haven't improved.
If it is a regression, state clearly when it worked last. If it never
worked, it cannot be a regression.
> I takes a lot of time to switch between the threads, when they are
> executed on different cores.
> Perhaps of the big buffer size of 512KB?
Of course, pushing 512kb to another cpu means lots and lots of cache
misses.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists