[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4981773A.1050403@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:30:34 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@...lemp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 7] x86/paravirt: selectively save/restore regs around
pvops calls
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:05:04 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> +#define PV_SAVE_REGS(set) \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RAX, rax); \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RCX, rcx); \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RDX, rdx); \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RSI, rsi); \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_RDI, rdi); \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R8, r8); \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R9, r9); \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R10, r10); \
>> + COND_PUSH(set, CLBR_R11, r11)
>>
>
> It's kind of messy. Can we do something clever here with token pasting?
>
I tried a few things, but no. Passing in just RAX, and then pasting
CLBR_##reg works, and the assembler accepts %RAX - but - the asm code
also #defines RAX <some stack offset>, so the assembler ends up seeing
%48. I considered renaming all the CLBR_ defines to CLBR_rax, but that
looks unhappy too. So I stayed with this.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists