[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129120935.GB9221@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:09:35 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-01-28-02-17 uploaded (i386 build errors: cpusets &
kexec)
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:28:50AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:30:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:56:31 -0800
> > Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > > akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> > > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-01-28-02-17 has been uploaded to
> > > >
> > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> > > >
> > > > and will soon be available at
> > > >
> > > > git://git.zen-sources.org/zen/mmotm.git
> > >
> > >
> > > 10 randconfigs on i386, 1 good build.
> > >
> > > The other 9 ended with either of these build errors:
> > >
>
> [snip]
>
> > So does that.
> >
> > --- a/kernel/printk.c~kexec-add-dmesg-log-symbols-to-proc-vmcoreinfo-lists-fix-fix
> > +++ a/kernel/printk.c
> > @@ -137,11 +137,13 @@ static char *log_buf = __log_buf;
> > static int log_buf_len = __LOG_BUF_LEN;
> > static unsigned logged_chars; /* Number of chars produced since last read+clear operation */
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > void log_buf_kexec_setup(void)
> > {
> > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_buf);
> > VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(log_end);
> > }
> > +#endif
> >
> > static int __init log_buf_len_setup(char *str)
> > {
> > _
>
> Weird, I thought I checked that just now. In any case this email
> was already in my inbox. In any case, I can now produce the problem,
> and this patch resolves it.
>
Sorry, i didn't think to check on conditions when CONFIG_KEXEC wasn't set. I
assumed we had a stub for all the VMCOREINFO defines. Why don't we fix it in
that manner? I mean we have serveral arch specific additions to vmcoreinfo, all
of which apparently must be ifdefd for this to work. Why not just fix it in
conditional definition?
Neil
> --
> Simon Horman
> VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
> H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists