[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129145921.GC6512@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:59:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frank Mehnert <Frank.Mehnert@....COM>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add might_sleep() to do_page_fault()
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> VirtualBox calls do_page_fault() from an atomic context but runs into a
> might_sleep() way pas this point, cure that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index 67e4df5..bb7f946 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -908,6 +908,11 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
> }
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> }
> + /*
> + * The above down_read_trylock() might have succeeded in which case
> + * we'll have missed the might_sleep() from down_read().
> + */
> + might_sleep();
should go into the 'else' branch i guess? In the down_read() case we
already had the check.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists