[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129174153.GH18233@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:41:53 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH E 08/14] OMAP clock: move rate recalc, propagation code up to plat-omap/clock.c
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:27:51PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Previously the individual clock recalculation functions handled their
> own rate recalculation. This can be handled in the clk_set_rate(),
> clk_set_parent(), and recalculate_root_clocks() functions in
> plat-omap/clock.c. Removes duplicate code and clarifies the role of the
> recalc functions.
I must say that this commit looks very much like a combination of
my commits from November:
[ARM] omap: move clock propagation into core omap clock code
[ARM] omap: remove unnecessary calls to propagate_rate()
[ARM] omap: move propagate_rate() calls into generic omap clock code
which do basically the same thing a little more efficiently, and an
additional patch from you to call ->recalc after set_rate or
reparenting a clock.
So I think I can drop everything from this apart from the additional
recalc calls, and the removal of those omap2_dpllcore_recalc() calls.
Please confirm my suspicions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists