[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901291039360.15448@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:43:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] epoll fix own poll()
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:32:38 -0800 (PST) Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > But which kernel version are you looking to get this merged into?
> >
> > The limit reworking one, ASAP. The epoll poll fix, dunno.
> > I'd like to see it staged in your tree for a bit. How much timeframe
> > difference are we looking at, from .29 to .30?
>
> The usual - 2.5 months(ish)
>
> What is the impact of the bug which this patch fixes?
I think we can move the poll-fix (and definitely the debug-nuke-fix) to .30.
The bug happens when you add an epoll fd inside another wait container
(epoll, poll, select). You may get a wakeup, to only find out later that
epoll_wait() has no event for you. The bug has been there since day-1, and
it has only recently been noticed.
Since it is quite some coe change, I'd like it to stage in your toxic tree
for a while :)
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists