[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129192423.GC31847@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:24:23 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
Sandro Bonazzola <sandro.bonazzola@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w35und: fix usb_control_msg() error handling in
wb35_probe()
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:10:42PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:06:33PM +0200, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> >>>
> >>> If successful, the usb_control_msg() function returns the number of
> >>> bytes transferred. Fix up wb35_probe() to only bail out if the function
> >>> returns a negative number.
> >>>
> >>> Reported-by: Sandro Bonazzola <sandro.bonazzola@...il.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> >>
> >> I'm confused, should I apply this patch or not?
> >
> > Yes, you should. What's confusing you here?
>
> Oh, looking at the thread, I see how you got confused. The patch
> doesn't fix all of Sandro's problems but is an obvious improvement so
> it should be merged.
Hm, it doesn't apply to the latest -next tree, care to respin it?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists