[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129195447.GA14636@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:54:47 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Xiaoning Ding <dingxn@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: a question about p4_clockmod module on Xeon quad core
processors
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:40:25AM -0800, Xiaoning Ding wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. So the conclusion is that ACPI-cpufreq
> can reduce power consumption by lowering cpu frequencies, and
> p4-clockmod can hardly save power because CPU frequences are not
> changed.
yes. and also that it inhibits entering deeper C states for longer periods.
> My experiments do not consider power consumption. It only requires to
> slow down the speed of some cores by either reducing frequencies or
> clock modulation. In such case, p4-clockmod is still a good choice for
> me. Can anyone give me some hints on whether p4-clockmod works on Xeon
> quad-core processors, and how to get it work?
I'm not sure if the registers are still there on quad cores, but I
would be surprised if they weren't. Hitting them directly with
msr tools is probably the best way, or writing a small program
that manipulates /dev/cpu/*/msr directly.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists