linux-kernel - Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] x86: i2c rtc instead of cmos rtc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ae48b020901291205ie0db5abj1a8c06528b9b46e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:05:26 -0800
From:	Ed Swierk <eswierk@...stanetworks.com>
To:	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
Cc:	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] x86: i2c rtc instead of cmos rtc

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Alessandro Zummo
<alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it> wrote:
>  While I can't judge on what's convenient to you, I do not feel
>  fine in having a kernel option to disable the rtc and another to load
>  a specific i2c one.

Would you prefer a single option to select the rtc (something like
rtc.device={cmos|i2c,ds1339,1,0x68})? Or do you object to any option
at all?

--Ed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/