[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49821F99.4070108@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:28:57 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kristian Høgsberg <krh@...planet.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 7/7] firewire: sbp2: add workarounds for 2nd and 3rd
generation iPods
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Obviously they changed something in Ubuntu 8.10 which suddenly made 3rd
>> gen iPods vulnerable too. If the report is accurate, then this is /not/
>> the READ CAPACITY 10 issue where device's capacity report is off by one.
>> (The reported capacity without workaround is an even number and thus
>> possibly correct.)
>
> Don't make that assumption. One of the small number of devices which
> really did have an odd number of sectors was an early iPod.
Ah, interesting.
(Jarod, didn't you see OS X report the same size on that 3rd gen. iPod
as Linux without quirk flag, or did I dream this? In any case this
could of course simply mean that OS X uses a wrongly reported size...)
>> Rather, this is apparently the kind of the bug where
>> an access which includes the last sector corrupts some state in the
>> firmware, causing the firmware to error out on subsequent accesses. The
>> actual IO errors in the reporter's log happen at low LBAs, not at LBAs
>> at the end.
>
> Are you aware of the last_sector_bug flag? It prevents sectors near
> the end of the device from being accessed using anything other than
> single-sector reads or writes. Some devices don't like it if, for
> example, you do a 2-sector read that includes the last sector.
Now that you mention it I do remember. I would need to ask the reporter
of the Ubuntu bug who has a fully working 3rd gen iPod (unlike Jarod's
3rd gen iPod which doesn't work reliably anymore) to compile a kernel
from patched sources if I really wanted to investigate whether the
last_sector_bug flag fixes the issue too. The fix_capacity flag can be
easily enabled for FireWire disks by users of binary kernel packages at
runtime, so that's what I had the reporter try.
Hmm, I'm beginning to suspect that I should duplicate usb-storage's
if (sdev->type == TYPE_DISK)
sdev->last_sector_bug = 1;
into the FireWire drivers. There aren't any fundamental downsides to
this, are there?
>> Now, what does OS X do with those iPods? I don't know. Maybe they have
>> quirks lists like we do. There could be something to be found in the
>> Darwin sources. But I consider it more likely that OS X simply does not
>> do the kind of accesses that Linux does which tend to crash all those
>> crap firmwares left and right.
>>
>> Evidently, at least popular Windows incarnations don't do such accesses,
>> at least not in normal usage. Otherwise this class of firmware bugs
>> could simply not exist in mass market devices.
>
> Linux uses the last-sector accesses to check whether or not the device
> is part of a RAID. Apparently Windows and OS X don't support the kinds
> of RAID that need this.
Or they don't support these kinds of RAID over certain transports like
USB and FireWire...?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= ---= ===-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists