linux-kernel - Re: scheduler nice 19 versus 'idle' behavior / static low-priority scheduling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1233302861.6061.14.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:07:41 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Nathanael Hoyle <nhoyle@...letech.com>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scheduler nice 19 versus 'idle' behavior / static low-priority
	scheduling

On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 02:59 -0500, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:

> I am running foldingathome under it at the moment, and it seems to be
> improving the situation somewhat, but I still need/want to test with
> Mike's referenced patches.

You will most definitely encounter evilness running SCHED_IDLE tasks in
a kernel without the SCHED_IDLE fixes.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/