linux-kernel - Re: scheduler nice 19 versus 'idle' behavior / static low-priority scheduling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1233307742.7673.6.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:29:02 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Nathanael Hoyle <nhoyle@...letech.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scheduler nice 19 versus 'idle' behavior / static low-priority
	scheduling

On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 03:55 -0500, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:

> Any reason not to apply this fairly simple patch against the 2.6.27
> series kernel I'm running now? Are there other relevant changes you're
> aware of in the later kernel revs for this problem?

You'd have to dig out a few other changes in order to apply it to 27.

Yes there are other relevant changes, but unless you're familiar with
the source, you'll be better off just trying 28.stable of the latest rc.
You'll have to find extract and back-port otherwise.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/