[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901301559.15170.trenn@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:59:13 +0100
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com
Subject: cpufreq on demand governor sampling rate restricted to HZ even on NO_HZ kernels
Hi,
depending on HZ set to:
100
250
1000
the ondemand governor is currently limited to poll the CPU load
and adjust the frequency (sampling rate sysfs variable) every:
200ms
80ms
20ms
This limitation does not consider NO_HZ which looks wrong?
If this is correct, can someone give me a pointer, I'd like
to understand why.
If NO_HZ can/should go down to 20ms polling and more (current
CPUs are able to switch fast enough, so that the ondemand governor
would calculate the default polling interval below 80ms for them),
this would hurt in respect of C-states at some point.
For performance reasons, one wants to poll as much as possible, for
powersaving reasons (C-states), one wants to poll as seldom as
possible.
I wonder whether it makes sense to dynamically adjust the polling
interval (e.g. by a hint (and initial wakeup) from the scheduler or
taking C-states into account) to:
- increase the sampling rate, e.g. based on context switching
activity
- lower sampling rate when the system is idle (to gain
full C-state efficiency)
Or in what other way deep C-states could be taken into account
in respect of ondemand polling?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists