linux-kernel - [RFC] NOHZ: fix nohz on cpu unplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:29:30 +0100
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC] NOHZ: fix nohz on cpu unplug

Ingo, Thomas,

After using cpu unplug I have seen one cpu with enabled ticks on s390,
even on a idle systems. It turned out that nohz.cpu_mask is not
updated on cpu unplug. 
In select_nohz_load_balancer we check if the system is completely
idle to turn of load balancing. We compare the weights of
cpu_online_map with nohz.cpu_mask.
Since cpu_online_map is updated on cpu unplug, but nohz.cpu_mask is
not, the check fails and the scheduler believes that we need an 
"idle load balancer" even on a fully idle system. Since the ilb 
cpu does not deactivate the timer tick this "breaks" NOHZ.

One possible fix is to only add the cpu to the nohz.cpu_mask,
if the cpu is active.

The alternative is to add nohz.cpu_mask in the cpu hotplug path.

This patch seems to work on s390 (Shortly tested with kvm guests
with cpu hotplug and kvm_stat on the host), but I want to hear your
opinion.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: kvm/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ kvm/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3880,7 +3880,8 @@ int select_nohz_load_balancer(int stop_t
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();

 	if (stop_tick) {
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, nohz.cpu_mask);
+		if (cpu_active(cpu))
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, nohz.cpu_mask);
 		cpu_rq(cpu)->in_nohz_recently = 1;

 		/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/