[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49833350.1020809@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:05:20 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, x86@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: #tj-percpu has been rebased
Hello,
tj-percpu has been rebased. Sorry, the previous tree was discarded
because it was missing several patches in the middle but rebasing on
top of new misc/tj-percpu shouldn't be too difficult. What have
happened are...
* Rebased on top of the current 2.6/master[1].
* hardirq unification patches restored.
* linker bug fix and xen fix patches applied.
* misc/tj-cpus4096 created as tip/cpus4096 + uv_flush_tlb_others()
cleanup patch (w/ Cliff Wickman's fixes folded in) and got merged
into misc/tj-percpu.
* misc/tj-stackprotector created as tip/stackprotector^ + three
patches. The back tracked commit is merge with the previous
core/percpu. misc/tj-stackprotector got merged into misc/tj-percpu.
So, all in all, the rebase is complete. No patch is lost but on
hindsight it should really have been done by pulling in 2.6/master.
The end result is the same anyway sans slightly simpler merge tree and
it definitely doesn't feel like it's worth the trouble. Well, what's
done is done. Please keep sending patches.
The git vector is as always...
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu
Thanks.
--
tejun
[1] f2257b70b0f9b2fe8f2afd83fc6798dca75930b8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists