[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233345190.908.36.camel@lts-notebook>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:53:10 -0500
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
will@...wder-design.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix OOPS in mmap_region() when merging adjacent
VM_LOCKED file segments
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 10:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > ... what I think you have done is break the vma merging on
> > ordinary files: because of that irritating VM_CAN_NONLINEAR
> > flag which generic_file_mmap() and some others add in.
>
> Ahh. Yes. VM_CAN_NONLINEAR is a "reverse flag", ie unlike the other flags
> it's to some degree about being extra _normal_, not about being odd. Most
> special flags tend to disable the VM from doing some clever thing, this
> one enables it.
>
> > To break the merging won't cause anyone much trouble,
> > but is a slight regression we should fix.
>
> Yeah. Just masking it off when comparing is probably the simplest option.
> Make it a separate #define just for readability. There might be other
> flags like this in the future.
>
> > I'd have been very upset not to find something ;)
>
> Yay for you ;)
>
> And yes, this is the kind of thing that probably does mean that we're
> better off with the no-semantic-changes patches in -stable.
>
> Linus
>
> ---
> mm/mmap.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index d3fa10a..c581df1 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -658,6 +658,9 @@ again: remove_next = 1 + (end > next->vm_end);
> validate_mm(mm);
> }
>
> +/* Flags that can be inherited from an existing mapping when merging */
> +#define VM_MERGEABLE_FLAGS (VM_CAN_NONLINEAR)
> +
> /*
> * If the vma has a ->close operation then the driver probably needs to release
> * per-vma resources, so we don't attempt to merge those.
> @@ -665,7 +668,7 @@ again: remove_next = 1 + (end > next->vm_end);
> static inline int is_mergeable_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> struct file *file, unsigned long vm_flags)
> {
> - if (vma->vm_flags != vm_flags)
> + if ((vma->vm_flags ^ vm_flags) & ~VM_MERGEABLE_FLAGS)
> return 0;
> if (vma->vm_file != file)
> return 0;
I tried this patch atop 29-rc3 + your patch from yesterday with my
simple test program at http://free.linux/hp.com/~lts/Tests/mmap_lock.c.
The test program shows the /proc/<pid>/maps before and after the mmap
and attempted merge. It's not merging:
7fd20a668000-7fd20a66a000 rw-p 7fd20a668000 00:00 0
7fd20a68a000-7fd20a68b000 r--s 00000000 68:23 6608852 /tmp/tmpfVx1SFL (deleted)
7fd20a68b000-7fd20a68c000 r--s 00001000 68:23 6608852 /tmp/tmpfVx1SFL (deleted)
7fd20a68c000-7fd20a690000 rw-p 7fd20a68c000 00:00 0
Ad hoc instrumentation shows that it's the VM_ACCOUNT flag that is
different between the existing file segment and the one attempting the
merge:
is_mergeable_vma: !mergable: vma flags: 0x80020f9:0x1020f9
| |-VM_ACCOUNT
+-----------VM_CAN_NONLINEAR
So happens, I'm mapping with MAP_SHARED, so the VM_ACCOUNT flag gets
cleared later in mmap_region(). Comments say that this is for checking
memory availability during shmem_file_setup(). Maybe we can move the
temporary setting of VM_ACCOUNT until just before the call to
shmem_zero_setup()?
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists