[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49835DF5.6000301@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:07:17 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [Fwd: [PATCH] voyager: fix up for moving the generic smp call func
to pointers]
Ingo - this is the second patch.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [PATCH] voyager: fix up for moving the generic smp call func to pointers
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:35:24 +0000
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
commit e7986739a76cde5079da08809d8bbc6878387ae0
Author: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Date: Tue Dec 16 17:33:52 2008 -0800
x86 smp: modify send_IPI_mask interface to accept cpumask_t pointers
Changed all the IPI ops to take pointers, but didn't update voyager,
which is now broken. Make the changes in voyager as well.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
---
arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c b/arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c
index b1b1bd3..7ffcdee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mach-voyager/voyager_smp.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void enable_local_vic_irq(unsigned int irq);
static void disable_local_vic_irq(unsigned int irq);
static void before_handle_vic_irq(unsigned int irq);
static void after_handle_vic_irq(unsigned int irq);
-static void set_vic_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask);
+static void set_vic_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *mask);
static void ack_vic_irq(unsigned int irq);
static void vic_enable_cpi(void);
static void do_boot_cpu(__u8 cpuid);
@@ -1597,16 +1597,16 @@ static void after_handle_vic_irq(unsigned int irq)
* change the mask and then do an interrupt enable CPI to re-enable on
* the selected processors */
-void set_vic_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
+void set_vic_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *mask)
{
/* Only extended processors handle interrupts */
unsigned long real_mask;
unsigned long irq_mask = 1 << irq;
int cpu;
- real_mask = cpus_addr(mask)[0] & voyager_extended_vic_processors;
+ real_mask = cpus_addr(*mask)[0] & voyager_extended_vic_processors;
- if (cpus_addr(mask)[0] == 0)
+ if (cpus_addr(*mask)[0] == 0)
/* can't have no CPUs to accept the interrupt -- extremely
* bad things will happen */
return;
@@ -1782,9 +1782,9 @@ void __init smp_setup_processor_id(void)
x86_write_percpu(cpu_number, hard_smp_processor_id());
}
-static void voyager_send_call_func(cpumask_t callmask)
+static void voyager_send_call_func(const struct cpumask *callmask)
{
- __u32 mask = cpus_addr(callmask)[0] & ~(1 << smp_processor_id());
+ __u32 mask = cpus_addr(*callmask)[0] & ~(1 << smp_processor_id());
send_CPI(mask, VIC_CALL_FUNCTION_CPI);
}
--
1.5.6.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists