[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901302026530.13686@blonde.anvils>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:33:46 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
will@...wder-design.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix OOPS in mmap_region() when merging adjacent VM_LOCKED
file segments
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
>
> I tried this patch atop 29-rc3 + your patch from yesterday with my
> simple test program at http://free.linux/hp.com/~lts/Tests/mmap_lock.c.
>
> The test program shows the /proc/<pid>/maps before and after the mmap
> and attempted merge. It's not merging:
>
> 7fd20a668000-7fd20a66a000 rw-p 7fd20a668000 00:00 0
> 7fd20a68a000-7fd20a68b000 r--s 00000000 68:23 6608852 /tmp/tmpfVx1SFL (deleted)
> 7fd20a68b000-7fd20a68c000 r--s 00001000 68:23 6608852 /tmp/tmpfVx1SFL (deleted)
> 7fd20a68c000-7fd20a690000 rw-p 7fd20a68c000 00:00 0
Some testing - now that's a great idea! Good spotting.
>
> Ad hoc instrumentation shows that it's the VM_ACCOUNT flag that is
> different between the existing file segment and the one attempting the
> merge:
>
> is_mergeable_vma: !mergable: vma flags: 0x80020f9:0x1020f9
> | |-VM_ACCOUNT
> +-----------VM_CAN_NONLINEAR
Sorry, I should have noticed that: VM_ACCOUNT was certainly on my
mind as a flag that gives trouble when merging vmas, but I'd
misconvinced myself that it wasn't a problem in this case.
>
> So happens, I'm mapping with MAP_SHARED, so the VM_ACCOUNT flag gets
> cleared later in mmap_region(). Comments say that this is for checking
> memory availability during shmem_file_setup(). Maybe we can move the
> temporary setting of VM_ACCOUNT until just before the call to
> shmem_zero_setup()?
Please let me think on that - we can live with the status quo for
the moment. I need to remind myself why I used that peculiar way
of conveying info from mmap.c to shmem.c: the right answer may be
just to pass another arg to shmem_zero_setup and shmem_file_setup.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists