[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090130134009.02d4a576.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:40:09 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: sandeen@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, t-sato@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] Allow SysRq emergency thaw to thaw frozen
filesystems
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:50:19 -0600
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
> +void do_thaw_all(unsigned long unused)
> +{
> + struct super_block *sb;
> + char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
> + while (sb->s_bdev && !thaw_bdev(sb->s_bdev, sb))
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Emergency Thaw on %s\n",
> + bdevname(sb->s_bdev, b));
> + }
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Emergency Thaw complete\n");
> +}
Is there any reason why we're not taking the appropriate locks here?
If so, please add a comment justifying the implementation.
> +/**
> + * emergency_thaw_all -- forcibly thaw every frozen filesystem
> + *
> + * Used for emergency unfreeze of all filesystems via SysRq
> + */
> +void emergency_thaw_all(void)
> +{
> + pdflush_operation(do_thaw_all, 0);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists