[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901310026200.4617@axis700.grange>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:27:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, maciej.sosnowski@...el.com,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, nicolas.ferre@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] dmaengine: introduce dma_request_channel and
private channels
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> > I'm writing a new dma driver. My DMAC has multiple channels and only
> > one channel is capable for generic memcpy and other channels have
> > fixed role.
> >
> > Does new framework allow dma driver make only one channel public?
>
> Yes, if the driver registers a dma_device for each channel.
>
> > Or should I register two dma_device for DMA_MEMCPY and DMA_SLAVE?
> > Could you give me some advice?
>
> Register multiple dma_devices, the public one with a DMA_MEMCPY, and
> the fixed role devices with DMA_PRIVATE, DMA_MEMCPY, and DMA_SLAVE
> capabilities.
>
> DMA_PRIVATE ensures that a channel is never considered for public consumption.
Maybe just two dma-devices would suffice: one with the public memcpy
channel, and one with the rest private slave channels?
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists