[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0901292244211.26985@utopia.booyaka.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:47:40 -0700 (MST)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH C 06/13] OMAP3 clock: DPLLs should enter bypass if new
rate is sys_ck
Hello Russell,
this E-mail responds to your comments on patches C 04 through C 08.
My understanding is that you'd like me to:
1. Compress patches C 04 through C 09;
2. Modify omap3_noncore_dpll_enable() to move the "if (!ret)
clk->rate = rate" outside and below the conditional;
3. Remove some of the blank lines before and after braces in C 06;
4. Modify the DPLL bypass clock handling to change the DPLL's clk->parent,
rather than return the bypass clock rate.
The above all make sense to me, and #4, if it works in practice, should be
a significant improvement over the existing code.
If this is what you're looking for, I'll send a compressed, modified
patch. Would you like it to be based on the codebase post C 03, or
against another commit?
regards,
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists