[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233296647.6071.15.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:24:07 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Nathanael Hoyle <nhoyle@...letech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduler nice 19 versus 'idle' behavior / static low-priority
scheduling
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 00:49 -0500, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
> Recently I installed the Folding@...e client, which many of you may be
> familiar with, intended to utilize spare CPU cycles to perform protein
> folding simulations in order to further medical research. It is not a
> multi-threaded client at this point, so it simply runs four instances on
> my system, since it has four cores. It is configured to run at
> nice-level 19.
>
> Because it is heavily optimized, and needs little external data to
> perform its work, it spends almost all of its time cpu-bound, with
> little to no io-wait or blocking on network calls, etc. I had been
> using it for about a week with no real difficulty until I went to watch
> another DVD and found that the video was slightly stuttery/jerky so long
> as foldingathome was running in the background. Once I shut it down,
> the video playback resumed its normal smooth form.
Sounds like a problem was recently fixed. Can you try 2.6.29-rc3 or
2.6.28.2?
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists