[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1233298321.17301.18.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:52:01 -0500
From: Nathanael Hoyle <nhoyle@...letech.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduler nice 19 versus 'idle' behavior / static low-priority
scheduling
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 07:24 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 00:49 -0500, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
>
> > Recently I installed the Folding@...e client, which many of you may be
> > familiar with, intended to utilize spare CPU cycles to perform protein
> > folding simulations in order to further medical research. It is not a
> > multi-threaded client at this point, so it simply runs four instances on
> > my system, since it has four cores. It is configured to run at
> > nice-level 19.
> >
> > Because it is heavily optimized, and needs little external data to
> > perform its work, it spends almost all of its time cpu-bound, with
> > little to no io-wait or blocking on network calls, etc. I had been
> > using it for about a week with no real difficulty until I went to watch
> > another DVD and found that the video was slightly stuttery/jerky so long
> > as foldingathome was running in the background. Once I shut it down,
> > the video playback resumed its normal smooth form.
>
> Sounds like a problem was recently fixed. Can you try 2.6.29-rc3 or
> 2.6.28.2?
>
> -Mike
>
I will try to do so as soon as I get the chance. Do you have any
specific info on the problem that you believe was fixed and/or the fix
applied?
Thanks,
-Nathanael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists